"Tekhnichna Diahnostyka ta Neruinivnyi Kontrol" (Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing) #2, 2026, pp. 17-35
Analysis of the results of non-destructive testing of austenitic welded joints of the 3th power unit of the Chornobyl NPP
V.M. Torop
, Ye.O. Davydov
, M.D. Rabkina
E.O. Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine
11 Kazymyr Malevych Str., 03150, Kyiv, Ukraine.
mail: v.torop@gmail.com
April 26, 2026 marked the 40th anniversary of the catastrophic explosion, which occurred in the 4th power unit of the Chornobyl
NPP (ChNPP). Since then, a colossal amount of diverse work has been carried out to eliminate the consequences of the accident.
To support the required level of safety and reliability of pipelines with a diameter of 325 mm (Dn 300) and wall thickness of
16 mm the Chornobyl Power Plant developed a special Program of diagnostic and repair-restoration operations. According to
this Program, a considerable scope of radiographic (RT), ultrasonic (UT), penetrant (PT) and visual-measuring testing (VT) of
welded joints of Dn 300 pipelines made from 08Х18Н10Т austenitic steel has been performed in the period from 1997 to 2005.
Despite the fact that more than 20 years have passed since then, the NDT methods are based on the same physical principles,
and practically the same methodological approaches to NDT are used. Therefore, analysis of the results of a large scope of
operational control is very useful for understanding the reliability of NDT methods, used in modern daily practice. It should
be noted that the work on analysis of the test results was performed as a separate task, and not specifically for evaluation and
comparison of NDT methods, so that the analysis presented in the paper is objective, retrospective and unbiased, i.e. it reflects
the possible and not the desirable result. Ref. 15, Table. 5, Fig. 17.
Keywords: NDT reliability, austenitic welded joints, radiographic (RT), ultrasonic (UT), penetrant (PT), visual-measuring (VT)
testing, actual dimensions of the crack
Отрима?? 23.03.2026
Received in revised form: 08.04.2026
Accepted: 12.05.2026
Posted online: 30.06.2026
References
1. Torop, V.M., Rabkina, M.D., Davydov, Ye.O. (2025) Retrospective
look at development of defects in austenitic steel
welded joints of Chornobyl NPP. In book: Welding and related
technologies for reconstruction of Ukraine. Abstr. of
Conf. Papers. Ed. by O.T. Zelnichenko. Kyiv, Paton Publishing
House, 105–107 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37434/WRT2025.28
2. Angeliu, T.M., Andresen, P.L., Sutliff, J.A., Horn, R.M.
(1999) Intergranular stress corrosion cracking of unsensitized
stainless stell in BWR enviroments. Proc. Ninth Int.
Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear
Power Systems – Water reactors, AIME.
3. (1975) US NRC Pipe Crack Study Group. Investigation and
Evaluation of Cracking in Austenitic Strainless Steel Piping
of BVR Plants. NUREG–75/061.
4. GOST 7512-82. Non-destructive testing. Welded joints.
Radiography method (Cancelled in keeping with order of
25.12.2015, No 209. Cancellation deadline postponed according
to order of 24.01.2018 No 15) [in Ukrainian].
5. PNAE G-7-017-89. Unified procedure for control of the base
materials (semi-finished products), welded joints and surfacing
in NPP equipment and pipelines. Radiografic Kontrol.
Moscow, USSR Gosatomenergonadzor [in Russian].
6. PK 1514-72. Rules of control of welded joints and surfacing
of components and structures on nuclear power plants,
test and research nuclear reactors and plants. Moscow, Energoatomizdat
(SOU NAEK 160:2020. Ensuring engineering
safety. Quality control of base metal, welded joints and
surfacing in equipment and piping of nuclear power plants
with WWER reactors. Technical requirements is in effect in
Ukraine instead of PK 1514-72 and PNAE G-010-89. Equipment
and piping of nuclear power plants. Rules of control)
[in Russian].
7. PNAE G-010-89. Equipment and piping of nuclear power
plants. Welded joints and surfacing (SOU NAEK 160:2020.
Ensuring engineering safety. Quality control of base metal,
welded joints and surfacing in equipment and piping of nuclear
power plants with WWER reactors. Technical requirements)
[in Russian].
8. PNAE G-7-008-89. Rules for the design and safe service of
equipment and piping on nuclear power plants (SOU NAEK
158:2020. Ensuring engineering safety. Technical requirements
for the design and safe operation of equipment and
piping on nuclear power plants with WWER reactors and NP
306.2.227-2020. General safety requirements to the design
and operation of equipment and piping of nuclear power
plants instead of PNAE G-7-008-89, PNAE G-7-009-89 are
in effect in Ukraine) [in Russian].
9. PNAE G-7-009-89. Equipment and piping of nuclear power
plants. Welding and surfacing. Main principles [in Russian].
10. МТ-34-70-023-86. Procedure for ultrasonic testing of austenitic
welded butt joints with wall thickness of 10-25 mm
during nuclear power plant mounting and operation [in Russian].
11. DSTU ISO 17635:2018 (EN ISO 17635:2016, IDT; ISO
17635:2016, IDT) Non-destructive testing of welded joints.
General rules for metallic materials [in Ukrainian].
12. Chassignole, B., Guerjouma, R.El., Ploix, M.-A., Fouquet,
T. (2010) Ultrasonic and structural characterization of
anisotropic austenitic stainless steel welds: Towards a
higher reliability in ultrasonic non-destructive testing.
NDT & E International, 43(4), 273–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.005
13. MtSU-7-97. Methods of ultrasonic control of austenitic
welded joints Ø325×15 of nuclear power plants with RBMK
reactors. Moskow, NGO TsNIITMASH [in Russian].
14. Razygraev, N.P., Razygraev, A.N. (2021) Ultrasonichead
wave control of welded connections of Du-300 pipelines at
Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Technical Diagnostics and
Non-Destructive Testing, 1, 48–58 [in Russian].
15. Doctor, S., Jehenson, P. (1988) Description of the PISC III
Round Robin Test on Cast Stainless Steel (CCSSRRT) and evaluation
of results. Intern. J. of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 35(1-4), 3–15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(88)90087-7
16. Anderson, M.T., Diaz, A.A., Cinson, A.D., Crawford, S.L.,
Cumblidge, S.E., Doctor, S.R., Denslow, K.M., Ahmed, S.
(2011) An assessment of ultrasonic techniques for far-side
examinations of austenitic stainless steel piping welds.
NUREG/CR-7113, PNNL-19353, NRC Job Code N6398.
17. ASTM International (2018) ASTM E2862 Standard Guide
for Probability of Detection Analysis for Hit/Miss Data.
18. Department of Defense (2009) MIL-HDBK-1823A
Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment.
19. ENIQ (2010) Recommended Practice 2 – Inspection
qualification methodology.
20. Uzun, H., Gustiani, D. (2024) Review of phased array
ultrasonic testing of weld joints. J. of Marine and Engineering
Technology, 4(2), 77–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58771/joinmet.1525521
21. Kim, Y., Cho, S., Park, I.K. (2021) Analysis of flaw detection
sensitivity of phased array ultrasonics in austenitic steel
welds according to inspection conditions. Sensors, 21(1),
242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010242
22. Li, C., et al. (2025). Study on phased array ultrasonic testing
techniques for austenitic stainless steel butt welds. J. of
Fusion Energy, 44, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-025-00475-6
23. Kumar, S., Menaka, М., Venkatraman, В. (2021) Performance
comparison of phased array transducers for inspection of
dissimilar welds on nuclear reactor components. Annals of
Nuclear Energy, 162, 108482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108482
24. Duan, J. X., et al. (2018) Hybrid ultrasonic TOFD imaging
of weld flaws. J. of Nondestructive Evaluation, 37, 23. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0476-2
25. Bürchner, Т., et al. (2025) Quantitative comparison of the total
focusing method, reverse time migration, and full waveform
inversion for ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasonics, 155, 107705.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107705
26. ISO 9712 (2021) Non-destructive testing – Qualification and
certification of NDT personnel.
27. EN ISO 17635 (2016) Non-destructive testing of welds –
General rules. European Committee for Standardization.
28. RD EO 0488-03 (2003) Methodological recommendations
for assessing the reliability of means and methods of nondestructive
testing. Guidance document. Moscow [in Russian].
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Suggested Citation
V.M. Torop, Ye.O. Davydov, M.D. Rabkina (2026) Analysis of the results of non-destructive testing of austenitic welded joints of the 3th power unit of the Chornobyl NPP.
Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing, 02, 17-35.
https://doi.org/10.37434/tdnk2026.02.03