Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing, 2026, №03

2026 №03 (04)

DOI of Article 10.37434/tdnk2026.03.01

2026 №03 (02)

---

"Tekhnichna Diahnostyka ta Neruinivnyi Kontrol" (Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing) #3, 2026, pp. 3-27

Adaptive integrity management of the ukrainian gas transmission system in the context of industry 4.0/5.0 paradigm

S.Yu. Maksymov¹, O.I. Zvirko², O.S. Milenin¹, L.I. Nyrkova¹, I.I. Chudyk³, V.B. Zapukhliak³, V.V. Rudko⁴

¹E.O. Paton Electric Welding Institute of the NAS of Ukraine 11 Kazymyr Malevych Str., 03150, Kyiv, Ukraine. E-mail: asmilenin@ukr.net
²G.V. Karpenko Physico-Mechanical Institute of the NAS of Ukraine. 5 Naukova Str., 79060, Lviv, Ukraine. E-mail: olha.zvirko@gmail.com
³Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas. 15 Karpatska str., 76019, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. E-mail: i.chudyk@nung.edu.ua 4JSC «Ukrtransgaz». 9/1 Klovskyi Uzviz, 01021, Kyiv, Ukraine.
⁴АТ «Укртрансгаз». 01021, м. Київ, Кловський узвіз, 9/1.

This work advances a scientifically substantiated concept of adaptive integrity management for the Ukrainian gas transmission system under the transition to the Industry 4.0/5.0 paradigm and increasingly complex operating conditions, including wartime impacts, decarbonization of the energy sector, and the prospective transportation of hydrogen–natural gas blends. A systematic life-cycle assessment framework for gas transmission system assets is proposed, integrating physics-based modelling, probabilistic reliability assessment methods, and innovative technologies for restoring the technical condition. A multi-level integrity management architecture is presented, encompassing system-level optimization of operating regimes, individualized assessment of defective pipeline sections based on finite element modelling, Weibull analysis, and Monte Carlo simulation, as well as prediction of degradation processes as a key component of predictive maintenance. Particular attention is devoted to the adaptation of repair technologies to the current technical condition of structures, taking into account corrosion–hydrogen degradation mechanisms and localized stress–strain states. 36 Ref., 1 Tabl., 23 Fig.
Keywords: gas transmission system, adaptive integrity management, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, predictive maintenance, finite element modelling, hydrogen degradation, corrosion cracking, repair

Received: 07.07.2026
Received in revised form: 10.08.2026
Accepted: 06.09.2026
Posted online: 22.09.2026

References

1. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L. (2021) Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 – Inception, conception and perception. J. of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
2. Elijah, O., Ling, P., Rahim, S. et al. (2021) A survey on Industry 4.0 for the oil and gas industry: Upstream sector. IEEE Access, 9, 144438–144468. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1109/access.2021.3121302 3. Khan, F., Yarveisy, R., Abbassi, R. (2021) Risk-based pipeline integrity management: A road map for the resilient pipelines. J. of Pipeline Sci. and Engineering, 1(1), 74–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.02.001
4. Wanasinghe, T.R., Wroblewski, L., Petersen, B.K. et al. (2020) Digital twin for the oil and gas industry: Overview, research trends, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 104175–104197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2998723
5. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Fathi, M. et al. (2025) Beyond Industry 4.0: A systematic review of Industry 5.0 technologies and implications for social, environmental and economic sustainability. Asia-Pacific J. of Business Administration, 17(4), 889–914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-08-2023-0384
6. Okirie, A., Frank, L.E., Ozuru, O.N. (2025) Leveraging Industry 5.0 technologies for building resilience and sustainability in the oil and gas industry. American J. of IR 4.0 and Beyond, 4(1), 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54536/ajirb.v4i1.3718
7. Majstorovic, V. (2022) Application of Industry 4.0 model in oil and gas companies. J. of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 12(1), 77–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc2201077m
8. Wang, T., Feng, K., Ling, J. et al. (2024) Pipeline condition monitoring towards digital twin system: A case study. J. of Manufacturing Systems, 73, 256–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.02.006
9. Okirie, A., Lawson, E.F., Ozuru, N.O. (2026) Integrating Industry 4.0 and 5.0 technologies for sustainable, resilient oil and gas production operations. Advanced Manufacturing Research, 4(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21595/amr.2026.25525
10. Kovalko, M.P., Grudz, V.Ya. et al. (2002) Pipeline gas transport. Kyiv, ArenaEKO [in Ukrainian].
11. Grudz, V.Ya., Grudz, Ya.V., Tymkiv, D.F., Zapukhliak, V.B. (2019) Optimization of the operating modes of complex gas transportation systems under the conditions of their incomplete loading. Oil and Gas Industry of Ukraine, 1, 26–31 [in Ukrainian]. https://www.naftogaz.com/ckeditor_assets/Галузевий%20журнал/Journal-Naftogazovagaluz-01-2019.pdf
12. Grudz, V., Zapukhliak, V., Hryhorskyi, S.et al. (2024) Probability optimization for ensuring the reliability of natural gas distribution systems. Procedia Structural Integrity, 59, 757–762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.04.108
13. Lindgren, L.-E. (2007) Computational welding mechanics. Thermomechanical and microstructural simulations. Woodhead Publishing Limited.
14. Lemaitre, J., Desmorat, R. (2005) Engineering damage mechanics. Ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
15. Milenin, O., Velikoivanenko, E., Rozynka, G., Pivtorak, N. (2023) Novel approach for numerical evaluation of limiting state and reliability of corroded pipelines under in-service repair welding. Welding in the World, 67(10), 373–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-023-01543-1
16. Milenin, O., Velikoivanenko, E., Rozynka, G., Pivtorak, N. (2019) Residual strength and reliability of corroded pipelines–monte-carlo approach for consideration of spatially nonuniform material properties. In: Proc. of the Second Intern. Conf. on Theoretical, Applied and Experimental Mechanics. Ed by E. Gdoutos. ICTAEM 2019. Springer, Cham. Structural Integrity, 8, 321–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21894-2_59
17. Milenin, O. (2017) Numerical prediction of the current and limiting states of pipelines with detected flaws of corrosion wall thinning. J. of Hydrocarbon Power Engineering, 4(1), 26–37. http://elar.nung.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/6387/1/5884p.pdf
18. Milenin, A., Velikoivanenko, E., Rozynka, G., Pivtorak, N. (2019) Probabilistic procedure for numerical assessment of corroded pipeline strength and operability. Intern. J. of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 171C, 60–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.02.003
19. Nyrkova, L.I., Osadchuk, S.O. (2023) Stress corrosion cracking of main gas pipeline steels: Assessment and prevention. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian].
20. Nyrkova, L.I. (2020) The influence of external and internal factors on stress corrosion cracking of low-alloyed pipe steel. J. of Hydrocarbon Power Engineering, 7(1), 8–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31471/2311-1399-2020-1(13)-8-15
21. Velikoivanenko, E., Rozynka, G., Milenin, A., Pivtorak, N. (2015) Evaluation of operability of the main pipeline with local wall thinning at repair by arc surfacing. The Paton Welding J., 1, 18–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/tpwj2015.01.03
22. GBN V.3.1-00013741-12:2011. Main gas pipelines. Arc welding repair under operating conditions [in Ukrainian].
23. Makhnenko, V.I., Velikoivanenko, E.A., Milenin, A.S. et al. (2011) Admissible pressure for filler of sealed sleeves used to repair main pipelines. The Paton Welding J., 8, 22–26. https://patonpublishinghouse.com/tpwj/pdf/2011/pdfarticles/08/8.pdf
24. Demianchuk, D.O., Tsyrulnyk, O.T., Solovei P.R. et al. (2025) The influence of operation and notch orientation on the impact toughness of API 5L X67 steel. Mater. Sci., 61(2), 249–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-025-00986-9
25. Zvirko, O.I., Savula, S.F., Tsependa, V.M. et al. (2016) Stress corrosion cracking of gas pipeline steels of different strength. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2, 509–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.066
26. Tsyrul’nyk, О.Т., Kret, N.V., Voloshyn, V.A., Zvirko, O.I. (2018) A procedure of laboratory degradation of structural steels. Mater. Sci., 53(5), 674–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-018-0123-1
27. Hredil, M.I., Nykyforchyn, H.M., Tsyrulnyk, O.T., Shtoiko, I.P. (2018) Method for determining the resistance of metallic structural materials to hydrogen embrittlement. Utility model patent 127310, U201801845, fill. 23.02.2018, publ. 25.07.2018 [in Ukrainian].
28. Nykyforchyn, H.M., Pustovyi, V.M., Slobodian, Z.V. et al. (2018) Method for retarding fatigue crack growth. Utility model patent 128514,. U201802248, fill. 05.03.2018, publ. 25.09.2018 [in Ukrainian].
29. Zvirko, O., Mytsyk, B., Nykyforchyn, H. Et al. (2023) Application of the various methods for assessment of inservice degradation of pipeline steel. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 30(24), 5058–5067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2022.2111732
30. Nykyforchyn, H., Tsyrulnyk, O., Zvirko, O., Krechkovska, H. (2019) Non-destructive evaluation of brittle fracture resistance of operated gas pipeline steel using electrochemical fracture surface analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 104, 617–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.037
31. Nykyforchyn, H., Tsyrulnyk, O., Zvirko, O., Hredil, M. (2020) Role of hydrogen in operational degradation of pipeline steel. Procedia Structural Integrity, 28, 896–902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.060
32. Nykyforchyn, H., Zvirko, O., Dzioba, I. et al. (2021) Assessment of operational degradation of pipeline steels. Materials, 14(12), 3247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123247
33. Milenin, O., Velykoivanenko, O., Rozynka, G., Pivtorak, N. (2025) Numerical assessment of cold crack susceptibility of X65 pipe steel during in-service repair welding of pipeline in transportation of gas-hydrogen blends. Procedia Structural Integrity, 68, 1010–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.06.163
34. Milenin, O., Velykoivanenko, O., Rozynka, G., Pivtorak, N. (2023) Numerical analysis of brittle strength of welded pipelines with corrosion metal loss in transportation of blends of natural gas with hydrogen. Welding in the World, 67(12), 2803–2809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-023-01612-5
35. Milenin, O.S., Velykoivanenko, O.A., Rozynka, G.P., Pivtorak, N.I. (2024) Numerical analysis of the regularities of the infuence of pipe steel degradation on the reliability of corroded main gas pipelines used for transportation of gas-hydrogen mixtures. Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing, 1, 8–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37434/tdnk2024.01.02
36. Milenin, O.S., Velikoivanenko, O.A., Rozynka, G.P., Pivtorak, N.I. (2023) Numerical assessment of brittle strength of field welds of the main gas pipelines at transportation of gas-hydrogen mixtures. Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing, 1, 22–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37434/tdnk2023.01.03

---

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC).

---

Suggested Citation

S.Yu. Maksymov, O.I. Zvirko, O.S. Milenin, L.I. Nyrkova, I.I. Chudyk, V.B. Zapukhliak, V.V. Rudko (2026) Adaptive integrity management of the ukrainian gas transmission system in the context of industry 4.0/5.0 paradigm. Technical Diagnostics and Non-Destructive Testing, 03, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.37434/tdnk2026.03.01

---

Advertising in this issue:

---