The Paton Welding Journal, 2026, #6, 49-55 pages
Characteristics of informational signals in ToFD inspection of HDPE pipes
S.M. Hlabets1
, V.S. Eremenko1
, Yu.V. Kuts1,2
1National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
37 Prosp. Beresteiskyi, 03056, Kyiv, Ukraine
E-mail: s.glabets@gmail.com
2Institute of General Power Engineering of the NASU
172 Antonovycha Str., 03150, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
The article presents the results of analysis of the subsurface and bottom-wall signals obtained during inspection of thick-walled
high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes using the Time-of-Flight Diffraction (ToFD) method. The experimental signals were
acquired using an OmniScan SX ultrasonic flaw detector. Analysis of the signal envelope and instantaneous phase was performed
in the MATLAB environment. It is shown that the envelope and frequency of the received signals, particularly the subsurface
and backwall signals, differ significantly from the nominal values of the corresponding characteristics of the ultrasonic
probe excitation signals. This factors must be taken into account during inspection, interpretation of testing results, and in the
search for new diagnostic features.
Keywords: ultrasonic non-destructive testing, time-of-flight diffraction, welded joint of polyethylene pipes
Received: 09.02.2026
Received in revised form: 27.03.2026
Accepted: 26.06.2026
References
1. Silk, M.G., Lidington, B.H. (1975) The potential of scattered
or diffracted ultrasound in the determination of crack depth.
Non-Destructive Testing, 8(3), 146–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-1021(75)90024-9
2. Taghipour, M.H. (2015) Study and evaluation of advanced
ToFD method for inspection of polyethylene pipes butt welding.
J. of Physical Sci. and Application, 5(5), 349–355. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5348/2015.05.005
3. Charlesworth, J.P., Temple, J.A.G. (2001) Engineering applications
of ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction. 2nd Ed. Baldock,
Research Studies Press.
4. Ginzel, E. (2025) CIVA confirmation of frequency dependence
of TOFD lateral wave. University of Waterloo. e-J. of
Nondestructive Testing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58286/31565
5. Boháčik, M., Mičian, M., Koňár, R., Hlavatý, I. (2017) Ultrasonic
testing of butt weld joint by TOFD technique. Manufacturing
Technology, 17(6), 842–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/x.2017/a/1213-2489/MT/17/6/842
6. Temple, J.A.G. (1984) The amplitude of ultrasonic time-offlight
diffraction signals compared with those from a reference
reflector. Inter. J. of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 16,
145–159. DOi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(84)90063-2
7. Mayworm, R.C., Alvarenga, A.V., Costa-Félix, R.P.B. (2015)
A metrological based realization of time-of-flight diffraction
technique. Physics Procedia, 70, 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.029
8. Nath, S.K., Balasubramaniam, K., Krishnamurthy, C.V.,
Narayana, B.H. (2010) Reliability assessment of manual ultrasonic
time-of-flight diffraction inspection for complex geometry
components. NDT & E International, 43(2), 152–162.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.007
9. Ogilvy, J.A., Temple, J.A.G. (1983) Diffraction of elastic
waves by cracks: Application to time-of-flight inspection. Ultrasonics,
21(6), 259–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(83)90058-6
10. Crawford, S.L., Cumblidge, S.E., Doctor, S.R. et al. (2008)
Preliminary assessment of NDE methods on inspection of
HDPE butt fusion piping joints for lack of fusion. Technical
Letter Report JCN N6398, Task 2D. Richland, WA, Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory.
11. Kenzie, B., Speck, J. (2005) Developments in integrity management
with TOFD inspection. Inspectioneering J. https://inspectioneering.com/journal/2005-07-01/273/developments-in-integrity-mana
12. DSTU EN 12201-1:2018: Piping systems for water supply,
drainage and sewerage under pressure. Polyethylene (PE).
Pt 1. General provisions. Kyiv, State Enterprise “UkrNDNC”
[in Ukrainian].
13. Correia, C. (2017) TOFD examination of HDPE butt weld
fusion joints. e-J. of Nondestructive Testing, 22(6), 1–11.
https://www.academia.edu/74628863/TOFD_Examination_of_HDPE_Butt_Weld_Fusion_Joints
14. Pettigrew, I.G. (2014) Advanced ultrasonic inspection of
HDPE welds. In: Proc. of the Offshore Technology Conf. Asia,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, OTC-25065-MS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4043/25065-MS
15. Qi, G., Li, Y., Ding, N. (2019) Measurement of acoustic basic
parameters of polyethylene pipe. IOP Conf. Series: Materials
Science and Engineering, 677(2), 022050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/677/2/022050
16. Ginzel, E. (2025) CIVA confirmation of frequency dependence
of TOFD lateral wave. e-J. of Nondestructive Testing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58286/31565
17. Babak, V., Babak, S., Eremenko, V. et al. (2021) Models and
measures in measurements and monitoring. Cham, Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70783-5
18. Babak, V., Babak, S., Eremenko, V. et al. (2023) Application
of discrete Hilbert transform to estimate the characteristics of
cyclic signals. In: Systems, decision and control in energy IV.
Ed. by A.Zaporozhets. Cham, Springer, 93–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22464-5_5
19. Lazarev, Y.F. (2013) MATLAB Handbook: an electronic textbook
for course and diploma design. Kyiv, NTUU KPI [in
Ukrainian].
Suggested Citation
S.M. Hlabets,
V.S. Eremenko,
Yu.V. Kuts (2026) Characteristics of informational signals in ToFD inspection of HDPE pipes.
The Paton Welding J., 06, 49-55.
https://doi.org/10.37434/tpwj2026.06.06